The Cleaning Industries Management Standard: CIMS-GB Certification
This information was provided to BOMA/Suburban Chicago by Eurest Services Green. Sustainable. Environmentally preferable. For many, these buzzwords represent the principles of sustainable building management. No longer a fad, green strategies and programs are becoming standard in not only the way we do business, but our day-to-day thinking. Property managers concerned with sustainability have so many options for implementing “green” technologies and alternatives that choosing the right elements of a green cleaning program for their buildings can be confusing and hard to decipher. Then, after deciding what program they want to implement, property managers need to ensure their cleaning service providers are capable of delivering on promises and reducing costs, while implementing strategies that benefit our environment. Fortunately, property managers can rely on the Cleaning Industry Management Standard (CIMS) for answers. The key components of a quality green cleaning program are outlined within CIMS and its latest addition: the CIMS-Green Building (GB) criteria. Administered by ISSA – the Worldwide Cleaning Industry Association, CIMS offers a certification process designed to ensure service providers are committed to the principles of green and to maintaining a high performance, healthy indoor environment. By outlining the extensive management and sustainability components of a green cleaning program, CIMS-GB serves as a resource for validating cleaning service provider green capabilities. Requiring certification takes much of the work out of the prequalification and selection process. By requiring CIMS and CIMS-GB certification from a service provider, property managers can be sure their buildings will be cleaned in compliance with green best practices. Launched in October 2009, the CIMS-GB criteria were added as the sixth dimension to the existing Standard, which sets forth a management framework to assist cleaning organizations in developing and maintaining quality, customer-focused organizations. Centered on five sections of best practices, CIMS outlines the key characteristics of a successful service organization and, as such, acts as a seminal benchmarking resource for the property manager. The principles outlined in the original Standard, launched in October 2007, form the foundation for a green cleaning program. After all, the end goal should be to have a clean, healthy facility — especially with increased public health threats like the H1N1 flu virus. Yet, reaching this goal demands effective management. Property managers therefore, should ensure their cleaning service providers have implemented policies and procedures in the following areas:
Only those organizations committed to the principles of effective management are truly capable of servicing customers in a quality, best-in-class manner. Additionally, those initially focused on effective management can move on to implementing a green cleaning program. Whereas the original Standard sets forth key management characteristics of a quality organization, CIMS-GB criteria take it a step further and outline principles of an effective green cleaning program. Based primarily on green cleaning requirements in the LEED-Existing Buildings: Operations and Maintenance (EBOM) rating system, compliance with CIMS-GB criteria helps property management secure credits toward LEED-EBOM certification. While the CIMS-GB criteria is largely based on specific green cleaning provisions of LEED-EBOM, its requirements exceed LEED requirements in a number of ways, allowing organizations to demonstrate commitment to sustainability. For example, while LEED-EBOM requires that 30 percent of chemicals meets specified green criteria; CIMS-GB specifies 60 percent (see “How they compare” chart on next page). Overall, CIMS-GB sets a framework to ensure service providers use environmentally preferable cleaning practices. Specifically, the criteria contain requirements in the following areas:
How they compare: LEED-EBOM and CIMS-GB certification
Sources: |
|